RISCONAPOSTOLUS

Question → Target

Target Board

Every internal research target with the evidence it has, the range that evidence covers and the check that would change its reading. A target is written before evaluation and is not a result.

5-1Discovery and dataEvaluation data partly established

Structure-Based AI Small-Molecule Discovery

Compare structural evidence, experimentally measured binding values and predicted properties for therapeutic targets and previously reported compounds.

Internal target
Binding free-energy error of 1 kcal/mol or less
Evidence so far
Common synthetic checks
What the evidence covers
The computational benchmark covers scores and chemical metrics. Patent novelty, synthesis, toxicity and therapeutic effects each require their own evidence.
What would change it
Select records with measured binding values, specify assay conditions and lock the split by scaffold, target family and date.
8-1Discovery and dataEvaluation data ready

Early Boost for Core Health R&D Technology

Align variables and clinical time series by schema, then assess predictive utility and privacy protection together.

Internal target
At least 95% of downstream predictive performance retained
Evidence so far
Synthetic harness (synth8) · Common synthetic checks
What the evidence covers
TCGA, GEO and MIMIC-IV are separate sources. Validation follows each source's endpoint, access terms and verified linkage.
What would change it
Run the same harness on the fixed TCGA-BRCA institution split with the baseline generator, then train the main generator and require it to beat the baseline on every endpoint at the same privacy budget.
18-2Patient safetyEvaluation data partly established

Medication Administration and Dispensing Safety

Define reference cases for pill identification and prescription review, covering lighting, occlusion, look-alike products and unit conversion errors.

Internal target
Zero missed contraindications or look-alike medication errors
Evidence so far
Synthetic harness (dispense18) · Common synthetic checks
What the evidence covers
Report a zero miss rate with the frozen test denominator. Product codes and source rules require verification across medical settings.
What would change it
Train the vision modules on the fixed ePillID split, build per-category calibration sets from its validation split and fill the same table on its test split; categories below the minimum calibration size are reported as uncertified with no automatic pass.
19-1Discovery and dataEvaluation data ready

Rare Disease Diagnostic Research

Rank candidate genes using variants, frequencies and symptom codes. Report conflicting evidence, uncertainty and reference versions.

Internal target
At least 90% of causal genes in the top five
Evidence so far
Published-case evaluation · Public-record audit (acmg19) · Synthetic replay (rare19) · Common synthetic checks
What the evidence covers
Evaluation can overstate performance when inputs already include the variant annotation or gene–disease association used as the reference answer.
What would change it
Read the literature for every expert-pathogenic missense variant instead of a sample, so that functional, segregation and case findings enter the ledger. Then re-measure sensitivity on genes outside the current 40, with the condition that specificity does not fall.
16-2Cognitive and neurological healthEvaluation data partly established

Non-Pharmacological Dementia Research

Simulate response delay and fatigue during memory, attention and executive-function tasks and inspect responses to difficulty transitions and stop criteria.

Internal target
Difficulty convergence in at least 95% of simulated episodes
Evidence so far
Synthetic harness (cog16) · Common synthetic checks
What the evidence covers
Convergence in simulation evaluates the behaviour of the training policy. Clinical cognitive improvement requires different evidence.
What would change it
Import stratum-level summary statistics inside the data-use zone, re-freeze the fixture and re-run; then test a response generator whose functional form differs from the scheduler's model.
16-3Cognitive and neurological healthEvaluation data partly established

Multimodal Dementia Diagnostic Research

Evaluate MRI and PET features along with pauses, vocabulary and sentence features from speech. Compare fixed models on independent cohorts.

Internal target
External cohort AUROC of at least 0.90
Evidence so far
Synthetic harness (cog16) · Common synthetic checks
What the evidence covers
Single-modality evaluation is available pending imaging and speech matched to the same participant and diagnostic visit.
What would change it
After approved data import, run the same harness with ADNI and OASIS-3 as the two external directions and evaluate speech separately; the synthetic figures are then replaced.
18-1Patient safetyEvaluation data partly established

Fall Prediction and Prevention

Evaluate a warning policy on timestamped sensor streams. Separate detection of falls from prediction before impact.

Internal target
At least 92% early-warning sensitivity in the high-risk group
Evidence so far
Common synthetic checks
What the evidence covers
A laboratory fall label and an advance alert for a patient are different endpoints. Measure lead time only for records that cover at least three seconds before impact.
What would change it
Register participant and event splits, alert lead time and the time denominator for false alarms.
18-3Patient safetyEvaluation data partly established

Surgical Environment Error Prevention

Evaluate tracking within the visible field. Use fixed sequences with occlusion to test arrival and removal counts.

Internal target
Zero instrument count omissions on the fixed test
Evidence so far
Common synthetic checks
What the evidence covers
In-frame presence and segmentation cover a different observation space from total instrument inventories. Report the synthetic missed-count denominator.
What would change it
Lock visibility, occlusion and tracking ID criteria and define separate video and synthetic count metrics.
12-1Crisis preventionEvaluation data partly established

Suicide Prevention Research for People with Mental Illness

Align event markers and note excerpts by time in offline research. Test for information leakage after the reference time and missed signals across subgroups using controlled examples.

Internal target
At least 90% recall for acute crisis signals
Evidence so far
Synthetic harness (prevent12) · Common synthetic checks
What the evidence covers
Recall in actual records requires a predefined population, observation window, timestamped independent reference and an eligible positive denominator.
What would change it
Use structured event markers for synthetic evaluation. Define the requirements for longitudinal labels in external evaluation.
12-2Crisis preventionEvaluation data partly established

Suicide Prevention Research for Bereaved People and Attempt Survivors

Evaluate events and transition rules in synthetic follow-up timelines. Verify that constrained responses stay within the designated state machine.

Internal target
Zero clinically disallowed response events on the fixed test
Evidence so far
Synthetic harness (prevent12) · Common synthetic checks
What the evidence covers
Transition behaviour and prevention after discharge require different follow-up evidence. The source and access terms for the follow-up cohort remain unverified.
What would change it
Lock the synthetic transition table and denominator. Define the independent outcomes required for further follow-up.
12-3Crisis preventionEvaluation data partly established

Social Isolation and Suicide Prevention Research

Use aggregate features for prolonged changes in social connection and count false alerts during ordinary interruptions.

Internal target
At least 85% precision for detecting transitions into sustained isolation
Evidence so far
Synthetic harness (prevent12) · Common synthetic checks
What the evidence covers
Living alone, short-term stress, subjective loneliness and sustained isolation are separate endpoints. Calculate precision only against verified transition labels.
What would change it
Register the scale, time window and eligibility criteria for isolation. Test missing sensor readings and ordinary interruptions in simulation.
12-4Crisis preventionEvaluation data partly established

Student Suicide Prevention Research

Evaluate age-appropriate language context and the handoff separately. Use fixed inputs to check that unrestricted responses cease following a crisis event.

Internal target
100% immediate handoff after a detected crisis state
Evidence so far
Synthetic harness (prevent12) · Common synthetic checks
What the evidence covers
Detection sensitivity and handoff rate use different denominators. An independent test corpus needs age, language and timestamped crisis annotations.
What would change it
Lock decision, success state and maximum delay for synthetic events. Register eligibility criteria for adolescent reference material.

© 2026 RISCON Co., Ltd.Privacy PolicyTerms of UseCookie SettingsContact

RISCON Labsrisconlabs.com